October Poem – by Don Thompson
October
I used to think the land
had something to say to us,
back when wildflowers
would come right up to your hand
as if they were tame.
Sooner or later, I thought,
the wind would begin to make sense
if I listened hard
and took notes religiously.
That was spring.
Now I’m not so sure:
the cloudless sky has a flat affect
and the fields plowed down after harvest
seem so expressionless,
keeping their own counsel.
This afternoon, nut tree leaves
blow across them
as if autumn had written us a long letter,
changed its mind,
and tore it into little scraps.
T.S. Eliot for Ash Wednesday
I’m posting this poem here today, in full, behind the cut for your reflection.
In my reading of it today, I am particularly struck by the word, Word, world, whirled alliteration and chaotic overlapping imagery in section V. How convoluted and subsuming so much of life is, so difficult to sort the word from the Word within the whirl of the world.
From dust do we come, and to dust do we return. I am ever reminded that Life is Short, so we should be quick to give love, and slow to anger if we are to do anything meaningful with the time we are given.
I fail at this quite often, and the ashes do remind me, particularly, to live more intentionally.
Ash-Wednesday
by T S Eliot
Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man’s gift and that man’s scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the aged eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?
Because I do not hope to know again
The infirm glory of the positive hour
Because I do not think
Because I know I shall not know
The one veritable transitory power
Because I cannot drink
There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is nothing again Read more…
Happy International Women’s Day, Feminist Coming Out Day, and Good stuff around the ‘Net
I haven’t written much here in a while. I’ve been busy, busy, busy living life, reading, working and such, and find myself contemplating the continued utility of this particular blogging space.
While I continue to cogitate on the future of Episcopalifem, here are some things I’ve been reading this week which have given me food for thought and focus and pleasure.
While there have been statistics presented demonstrating the women have experienced far less of a negative impact than men in the economic crisis, that appears to be at an end, especially as Tea Party types look to cut state/federal budgets and end collective bargaining rights as we’ve known them. The New York Times recently published this article His Recession, Becoming Hers to tell us all about how and why this is likely to change, and change for the long haul.
However, women are more concentrated in state and local jobs that are now on the chopping block as a result of efforts to cut taxes and reduce public spending. About 52 percent of state employees and 61 percent of the much larger category of local employees are women – many of them working as teachers, secretaries, or social workers.
Women make up a majority of two important public sector unions, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees and the American Federation of Teachers.
The economist Randy Albelda asserts that the conservative attack on public-sector unions resembles the welfare reform discussions of the 1990s, in which recipients of public assistance were labeled greedy, lazy welfare queens.
As a recent New York Times article put it, “Around the country, many teachers see demands to cut their income, benefits and say in how schools are run through collective bargaining as attacks not just on their livelihoods, but on their value to society.”
Yeah – who knew? teachers and welfare queens had so much in common, both being life sucking lazy sacks of shit, according to our conservative rabble rousers.
Jon Stewart, in his customary pithy awesome directness, does a great job of showing how teachers need to take the lead from Wall Street, when it comes to making a shared sacrifice, and negotiating out the contractual obligations of their employers in times of economic duress, and should definitely expect to take it across the chin. Wink, wink, jab, jab, since Teachers Have It Too Good (Wink)
Then, I stumbled across this excellent piece by George Lakoff, What Conservatives Really Want. This piece presents the framework in which uber-conservativism lives, the moral platform upon which is rests, and as you might have already strongly suspected, it has a lot to do with Daddy, and that what Daddy says goes. Oh, and they don’t believe in social responsibility, oh no, just individual responsibility alone. Lakoff posits:
The way to understand the conservative moral system is to consider a strict father family. The father is The Decider, the ultimate moral authority in the family. His authority must not be challenged. His job is to protect the family, to support the family (by winning competitions in the marketplace), and to teach his kids right from wrong by disciplining them physically when they do wrong. The use of force is necessary and required. Only then will children develop the internal discipline to become moral beings. And only with such discipline will they be able to prosper. And what of people who are not prosperous? They don’t have discipline, and without discipline they cannot be moral, so they deserve their poverty. The good people are hence the prosperous people. Helping others takes away their discipline, and hence makes them both unable to prosper on their own and function morally…
In conservative family life, the strict father rules. Fathers and husbands should have control over reproduction; hence, parental and spousal notification laws and opposition to abortion. In conservative religion, God is seen as the strict father, the Lord, who rewards and punishes according to individual responsibility in following his Biblical word.Above all, the authority of conservatism itself must be maintained. The country should be ruled by conservative values, and progressive values are seen as evil. Science should NOT have authority over the market, and so the science of global warming and evolution must be denied. Facts that are inconsistent with the authority of conservatism must be ignored or denied or explained away. To protect and extend conservative values themselves, the devil’s own means can be used against conservatism’s immoral enemies, whether lies, intimidation, torture, or even death, say, for women’s doctors.
Freedom is defined as being your own strict father — with individual not social responsibility, and without any government authority telling you what you can and cannot do. To defend that freedom as an individual, you will of course need a gun.
He also complains that the Democrats are awfully good at helping this Conservative world view right along:
…Democrats help conservatives when they function as policy wonks — talking policy without communicating the moral values behind the policies. They help conservatives when they neglect to remind us that pensions are deferred payments for work done. “Benefits” are pay for work, not a handout. Pensions and benefits are arranged by contract. If there is not enough money for them, it is because the contracted funds have been taken by conservative officials and given to wealthy people and corporations instead of to the people who have earned them.
Democrats help conservatives when they use conservative words like “entitlements” instead of “earnings” and speak of government as providing “services” instead of “necessities.”
Excellent points he makes, really. Do read the whole thing!
Another friend (waves to MOI) pointed out an excellent article from America Magazine that discusses the idea of individual responsibility, from a slightly different vanatage point, but one that feeds directly into the cultural world view of the uber-conservative, and that is, The Limits of Positive Thinking. In this article, the author talks about her work with the homeless, and how she winced her way through some workshops that were based on the ideas presented in The Secret – that is that positive thoughts/energy/intention attract positive thoughts, and that negative thoughts/energy/intention beget more negativity. So, you want a nice house with a picket fence, visualize it, and it will come to you! Only the author points out, um, not so much, because they blow off suffering or make that suffering one’s own fault. Is it the negative thinking of a five year old child that brings rape and beating down upon them? Is it negative thinking that causes an accident which brings a brain injury upon one, thereby impacting every facet and interaction of life?
This troubling idea, that affliction is doled out as punishment for one’s negative thoughts and that prosperity is a result of thinking positively, prompted me to reflect on my own understanding of suffering, informed at least in part by the writings of Blessed Julian of Norwich.
In Revelations of Divine Love, Julian offers no causal explanation for suffering. While she acknowledges human sinfulness, she also recognizes an unjust and fallen world in which all people suffer. In Julian’s vision of the parable of the lord and the servant, a lord sends his servant on a journey. While traveling, the servant stumbles and falls in a dell. Trapped in the dell, injured and alone, the servant suffers greatly. Instead of being angry at the servant’s clumsiness or sin, the lord mysteriously loves the servant more than ever. In this radical accounting, suffering is not simply negative, at least not in its entirety. Rather, it is sometimes the means through which humanity is drawn impossibly closer to God’s self.
During my year at the homeless shelter, I was confronted daily with the realities of homelessness, rape, addiction, violence and mental illness. In that space, Julian’s approach seemed not only more compassionate, but perhaps more helpful as well. Yes, our attitudes can and do positively improve our lives, but they do not explain suffering or success. All people suffer. We are not our own creations, tidy products of ideology. We are human beings, hopelessly interdependent, ugly and beautiful, both.
And thank god for that, huh?
Here is another excellent essay I came across today via a facebook friend, I think Elizabeth Kaeton. Debra Dean Murphy sums up the meltdown that is Charlie Sheen, Rob Bell’s version of hell, and the upcoming Ash Wednesday observance in her excellent piece, My Lent: Ashes, Addiction, and the Reality of Hell (Pace Rob Bell) in Religion Dispatches today. She ties these seemingly disparate cultural events up quite readily.
“Lent reminds us that we’re all in the same boat—the sinking ship of our failed attempts to save ourselves, love ourselves, and save those we love. The ashes are not mere symbol; they are not a public sign of our piety (exactly what Jesus …warns against in Ash Wednesday’s gospel reading). Instead, the ashes are as real as it gets—a sticky, gritty, grimy smear plastered to our foreheads, precisely on the same spot that the oil of baptism was applied. For Christians, the juxtaposition is as liberating as it is instructive: we are dying, yet we live. Death may be at our doorstep but it cannot steal our substance.”
And last, but most assuredly not least, PJ, Writer Extraordinaire has a neat little piece of micro-fiction/poetry up over at her place that will delight, called All Filler, No Killer (which, I beg to differ with her on because it’s my prerogative so to do…)
Love this song and video – Thanks PJ!
I really love Annie’s voice and her songs. Her lyrics always evoke something in me, touch some primal place in me, like she sees inside there. It doesn’t hurt that she sings in my range, so I find her songs satisfying to sing (although, my versions are definitely puny and paltry in comparison!)
Besides, the video for this song, evocative of Dangerous Liaisons, one of my favorite movies of all time, includes the sexy John Malcovich AND Hugh Laurie. So…here’s my offering to the Friday entertainment Gods – Enjoy!
You were the sweetest thing that I ever knew
But I don’t care for sugar honey if I can’t have you
Since you abandoned me
My whole life has crashed
Won’t you pick the pieces up
‘Cause it feels just like I’m walking on broken glass
Walking on walking on broken glass
The sun’s still shining in the big blue sky
But it don’t mean nothing to me
Oh let the rain come down
Let the wind blow through me
I’m living in an empty room
With all the windows smashed
And I’ve got so little left to lose
That it feels just like I’m walking on broken glass
Walking on walking on broken glass
And If you’re trying to cut me down
You know that I might bleed
‘Cause if you’re trying to cut me down
I know that you’ll succeed
And if you want to hurt me
There’s nothing left to fear
‘Cause if you want to hurt me
You’re doing really well my dear
Now everyone of us was made to suffer
Everyone of us was made to weep
But we’ve been hurting one another
And now the pain has cut too deep…
So take me from the wreckage
Save me from the blast
Lift me up and take me back
Don’t let me keep on walking…
I can’t keep on walking
I can’t keep on walking on broken glass
Walking on walking on broken glass
Shout out to Jay and Silent Bob
Since Bill+ reminded me by referring to them in the comments below – here’s one of my favorite Jay & Silent Bob clips.
Heeeeeeee.
More Holiday Amusement!
This one was sent to me by a colleague – very clever and amusing! The Story of the Nativity, told, digitally!
Erm…Uh….Yeah…
I’m so going to hell, but this is funny! From truthdig, via PJ Writer Extraordinaire!
“Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?”
While I am thrilled about the repeal of DADT and the possibility of at least SOME benefits for the first responders for 9/11 (many of whom were VOLUNTEERS), I am still dismayed by the words of two prominent Republicans who seem to blame the economic woes of America on the unemployed. I mean, unemployment benefits are so awesome, who wouldn’t want to remain sitting at home on their ass to collect their whopping average $293/week (as reported by MSN Money here. The max in my home state is a bit more generous at $584/week, but remember, that is the max…Not everyone who lives here gets that when they go on unemployment), rather than going out and finding gainful employment? Um, what about the employers who feel that the size of their “bonus” far outweighs the benefits of keeping people gainfully employed?
It certainly does bring to mind the famous passage from Dicken’s A Christmas Carol:
‘Are there no prisons?”
‘Plenty of prisons,’ said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.’And the Union workhouses.’ demanded Scrooge. ‘Are they still in operation?’
‘Both very busy, sir.’
‘Oh. I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course,’ said Scrooge. ‘I’m very glad to hear it.’
‘Under the impression that they scarcely furnish Christian cheer of mind or body to the multitude,’ returned the gentleman, ‘a few of us are endeavouring to raise a fund to buy the Poor some meat and drink, and means of warmth. We choose this time, because it is a time, of all others, when Want is keenly felt, and Abundance rejoices. What shall I put you down for?’
‘Nothing!’ Scrooge replied.
‘You wish to be anonymous?’
‘I wish to be left alone,’ said Scrooge. ‘Since you ask me what I wish, gentlemen, that is my answer. I don’t make merry myself at Christmas and I can’t afford to make idle people merry. I help to support the establishments I have mentioned-they cost enough; and those who are badly off must go there.’
‘Many can’t go there; and many would rather die.’
‘If they would rather die,’ said Scrooge, ‘they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.”
Really! Imagine, a civilized country, reportedly full of greatness and wealth – the American Dream and all that…which actually gives a shit about its most vulnerable constituents, because, well, it CAN, and it should, and it must.
Otherwise, aren’t we as a nation, like Gingrich and my state’s own Republican leader, Alex DeCroce (who “told business owners last week that New Jersey’s jobless benefits are “too good for these people.” He said someone collecting $550 a week has little incentive to seek work.”) saying we are not quite as civilized, great or wealthy as we claim, if we can’t even manage to take care of our own, be they “deserving” or no? When did WE the people, begin to mean, ME the people?
In my mind, the people who speak these words can not have been people who have ever been so humbled as to have to seek assistance to keep their families afloat, who have the unmitigated gall and amoral temerity to laud their unchallenged lives as a product of their own fortitude alone, rather than a capricious aligning of opportunity and circumstance.
Last night, I stood on line at the grocery store after work, waiting my turn to pay. I was tired, and aggravated (as grocery shopping tends to make me cranky de facto), and my grocery cart was full, and I was hungry and just wanted to go home.
There was a woman in front of me online, with a carriage full of baby food and formula almost obsessive-compulsively arranged in her cart. She was shuffling through her assistance checks, to be sure she could pay for what was in her cart, and kept having to put certain items back on the shelf because they weren’t covered by WIC. All these items were baby food jars – not desserts or junk food. She had to get out of the line at least twice.
At first, I was very grumpy that I had chosen this line. All I wanted to do was go home, and this woman was obviously going to take a long time to get her order rung up.
But then, it dawned on me, that when I bought baby food for my kids, I never had to worry about buying the right “kind” based on my ability to pay for it.
When she stepped out of the line a second time, I asked the cashier how much the jars were: $0.50 a piece, and there were around 10 of them. Because her order was already in process, and she was paying with WIC checks, I didn’t have a good way to get the cashier to allow me to pay for the items without the woman knowing, so when she returned with the correct items, I asked her if the foods the cashier held aside were ones her baby particularly liked. (I tried to be as discrete as one can possibly be in the front of a grocery store, because I wanted to help, but not embarass the woman, who seemed to be in her mid-30s, a Russian immigrant). She told me yes, and I told her that I would very much like to buy them if she would allow me to, as a Christmas gesture to her and her child.
Of course, she thanked me, but wouldn’t let me, and so I walked back to my cart feeling unsure as to whether I had done a good thing or not.
It broke my heart. I paid for the rest of my groceries, packed them into my car, and called home to tell my husband I was on my way, and as I was speaking to him, I burst into tears of anger and frustration as I stared the realization that I could have been that woman had just a few things in my life been different full in the face. There but for the grace of God go I, or words to that effect (because I don’t believe in that kind of God, but you get the gist). The world is capricious and my efforts only go so far – that could have been – could still be – me.
And honestly, that line from A Christmas Carol was reverberating in my head, because, apparently, this is the way so many Americans feel: the poor are parasites whom we can’t afford, so, “Are there no prisons? No workhouses?”
The pertinent part of the video starts at 2.09
From the email box: Weeweechu…
I’m bumping this one up because it’s cute and makes me smile! We all need some WeeWeeChu!

There was a romantic full moon in the sky when Pedro said, “Hey, mamacita, let’s do Weeweechu.”
‘Oh no, not now, let’s look at the moon!’ said Rosita.
‘Oh, c’mon baby, let’s you and I do Weeweechu. I love you and it’s the perfect time,’ Pedro begged.
‘But I wanna just hold your hand and watch the moon.’ replied Rosita.
‘Please, corazoncito, just once, do Weeweechu with me.’
Rosita looked at Pedro and said, ‘OK, one time, we’ll do Weeweechu.’
Pedro grabbed his guitar and they both sang…..
‘Weeweechu a Merry Christmas, Weeweechu a Merry Christmas, Weeweechu a Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year.’
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!!!
(What did you think weeweechu was ??????)
I work with some good people, you know?
This one made me cry
My mom sent me this story via email today. It’s not her story, but a story, and too good not to share!


Light A Candle





